NASA satellite ‘falling over Kyiv’ blasted as it was still in orbit

An expert has blasted the claim that the fireball seen over the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv last night was caused by a decommissioned NASA satellite falling back to Earth. Astronomer Dr Jonathan McDowell of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts tweeted that the notion was “stupidly incorrect”. He added that the satellite’s orbit “did not pass over Ukraine at all.” Instead, he explained, the track of the satellite was predicted to fall across southern South America, northern Africa, central Asia and China.

Writing on the Telegram messaging service, Kyiv military administation head Serhiy Popko had noted that a “bright glow” was seen over the city at around 10pm local time (8pm BST).

Following the sightings of the flash, an air raid alert was sounded, but “air defense was not in operation”, Mr Popko said.

He added: “According to preliminary information, this phenomenon was the result of a NASA space satellite falling to Earth.”

Since then, however, the Ukrainian air force has suggested that the glow might have been caused by a meteor burning up in the atmosphere, having ruled out the possibility that it was caused by a Russian air attack.

This explanation is supported by the State Space Agency of Ukraine, who said: “The flash was most likely caused by a meteorite falling from the Lyrid Stream.”

Earlier this week, NASA announced that their Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) spacecraft, which was decommissioned back in 2018, would plunge into the Earth’s atmosphere last night.

The US space agency was quick to refute the suggestion that their old satellite was responsible for the glow seen over Kyiv.

In fact, they said, at the time of the glow, RHESSI was “still in orbit”.

Analysis by the US Department of Defense had predicted a re-entry time of roughly 8.50pm EDT yesterday, give or take an hour — that is, 3.50am local time this morning in Kyiv.

Following Mr Popko’s claims, a NASA spokesperson told the AFP that, at that time, “that reentry [had] not yet occurred. No NASA satellite re-entered the atmosphere earlier today.”

RHESSI — which was launched into low-Earth orbit from Cape Canaveral back in February 2002 — was designed to study the physics of particle acceleration and energy release in solar flares and coronal mass ejections from the surface of the Sun.

Coronal mass ejections, NASA explained, “release the energy equivalent of billions of megatons of TNT into the solar atmosphere within minutes and can have effects on Earth, including the disruption of electrical systems.

“Understanding them has proven challenging. Data from RHESSI provided vital clues.

“It achieved this with its sole instrument, an imaging spectrometer, which recorded X-rays and gamma rays from the Sun.

“Before RHESSI, no gamma-ray images nor high-energy X-ray images had been taken of solar flares.”

A guide on how and where to see April’s hybrid solar eclipse tomorrow[INSIGHT]
Celestial ‘copycat’ could look just like black hole – if it exists[ANALYSIS]
Space-based solar power plants probed ahead of 2025 ‘roll-out'[REPORT]

Over the course of its mission, RHESSI recorded more than 100,000 X-ray events.

However, it was ultimately decommissioned after 16 years of operation due to difficulties maintaining communications with the satellite.

Earlier this week, NASA said it “expects most of the spacecraft to burn up as it travels through the atmosphere, but some components are expected to survive reentry.

“This risk of harm coming to anyone on Earth [was] low — approximately 1 in 2,467.”

At present, it is not clear exactly over where on the Earth’s surface RHESSI did break up.

As Dr McDowell noted a few hours ago, “RHESSI should have reentered by now. No new info from Space Force yet though.”

Predicting its reentry path was difficult, he explained, because “It was going at 27,000 km/hr [16,777 miles per hour] — so a two hour uncertainty in reentry time is 54,000 kilometres [33,554 miles] uncertainty in location.”

Source: Read Full Article